mgarcia@recomspr.net | 00:01
As at the moment because obviously, yeah, and you can speak of your proposal, you know the specifics of the proposal, I'll leave that to you and you can.
Speaker 2 | 00:18
Yes, absolutely, we want to have this conversation.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 00:22
Okay, so you is your background of sure.
Speaker 2 | 00:27
Actually I'll turn it over to George if you're going to be the lead, I'm describing the head. Maybe Jason can pull up the layout for that work, George? Yeah.
Speaker 3 | 00:38
Give me one second.
Speaker 4 | 00:40
So while George puts that on the screen, do we have a timeline to work with?
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 00:45
Okay, so the prop. I don't think it's going to be 660 days. So the proposal originally was going to be 60 to 90 days. The question is how much is going to be from 1690? I don't know, maybe it's a hundred, maybe it's fifty, maybe it's... I don't know the number. You are the ones that...
That's why we're here to figure this out. Yeah, I'm still waiting for them to practice. Okay, thank you. So who's a.
Speaker 2 | 01:36
George is going to take the lead on describing the project, and then either George or Jason will pull up the layout.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:43
Okay, go ahead.
Speaker 2 | 01:44
George, you're mute. George.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:47
You're mute.
Speaker 3 | 01:50
Give me one second. Yes. To answer your question. On timing, I'm pulling the layout up now. The existing fastest path is the existing transformation.
Coming into that turban 1 GSU and any places we can come into the substation. The slow-moving item will be a large transformer step-up in the substations. So, as soon as I get this file, show you.
Speaker 2 | 02:32
Now. We're just talking about Gary right now.
Speaker 3 | 02:34
That's right. Yep. Okay, sure.
Did everybody see my screen?
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 03:10
Yes.
Speaker 3 | 03:12
Okay, so AA Gary, the primary connection points are the existing GSU at this GA's turbine down here to the right. We'll bring in an overhead system that will tie in a series of Rolls-Royce generators to that location.
Then, I'm sorry, we're putting the turbines into the existing GSU, and the balance will be Rolls-Royce into the substation on the hill. What we primarily need to understand from the Loom standpoint is we don't have the one lines for these substations to understand where we could connect to existing GSU or existing bays that will expedite the timeline of the project. The easy connection point is that 400MW over here to the right on that GA's turbine. My understanding is it's out of service.
So, we will use the low side of that transformer to step up to transmission voltage with our turbines, the 800s, and the 600s. That's generally the concept: take 400MW to the existing GSU, and the remaining to the substation.
Speaker 2 | 04:40
When you say maybe, you just call the unit one, I think what you're referring to, right? For yes. Okay, so there is a connection point. I think there's a structure outside just that line comes from the generator right now.
There are cables that go from there. Things that a cable goes inside the plant, and an overhead structure goes all the way to the 02:30kV. Yeah, right. That would be the one I think will be... Of course, I so Comer that we would expect to come inside TR, and we would do the connection point inside TR, so you would own up to the conductors coming inside to KN.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 05:23
Okay, so the question will be into that 02:30, correct.
Speaker 2 | 05:26
I think that's what he's proposing. So I was trying to understand exactly what.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 05:30
When we went on the site visit originally, what you suggested was to connect to the unit number one. It's going to be our service, right?
Speaker 2 | 05:51
So they did. They proposed to the main power transformer, the existing one on the bypassing the MPT or directly to the two. Very clearly I.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 06:03
I honest is all. So.
Speaker 2 | 06:04
Yeah, you so just want to make sure that the roads rates are going to be generating that voltage.
Speaker 3 | 06:12
So the turbines were generated at 13.2, which would match your turbine. So we could come in the low side of that transformer. The Rolls-Royce will be stepped up from 480 generation locally. They'll be stepped up again to transmission voltage.
Speaker 2 | 06:32
I think the main power is 34 or 35 kV. So you have to generate, I think, on that. So on the low side of unit one, it's 35.24. Okay, yeah, we are at 13.8 now. It was not all that yesterday, not properly. Yes, you have to put in everything, therapy on that one. We own everything inside the... Just for the clarity purposes, we want to make sure we're on the same page that you come inside the 2:30 GT. We hope they canion points and any protections we need and anything else that we would work on.
Okay.
Speaker 3 | 07:11
So there was an understanding that there might be 115 kV down here in these old combined cycles. Is that the case?
Speaker 2 | 07:22
No, that's not the case. It connects to the.
Speaker 3 | 07:25
So these are all 2:30 step-ups from the 13.2 or.
Speaker 2 | 07:32
Okay, yes, there's nothing generation to the best of my knowledge connect to 115 here.
Speaker 3 | 07:38
Okay, there was a smaller yard here and then a larger one up on the hill. These are both.
Speaker 2 | 07:43
02:31 at the bottom, 3115.
Speaker 3 | 07:48
So there is a 01:15 up here?
Speaker 2 | 07:50
No, up in there. The other.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 07:52
The other one up to that one has 01:15. Yeah.
Speaker 3 | 07:59
Okay, so that's generally the plan. The challenge here will be taking down the buildings and structures and things that are in places where these generators are laid out. This one's a nice field. That'll be easy, but there are some buildings that need to be demolished here, and some work will take some time.
But ultimately, yeah, the connection would be here and then up the.
Speaker 2 | 08:23
Yeah, I think there are two ways it comes into 230kV maybe if I can just step up. If I'm wrong, the one that comes from here that steps up. There's a structure. I think there's an underground cable from inside the yard that comes into the structure, and from the one that goes to the 230.
yeah.
Speaker 3 | 08:45
There's an underground connection here. There's a structure here for both turbines that go up the hill. Is that where the underground goes here?
Speaker 2 | 08:54
Underground here comes to our yard, so. Then the second one goes from here. The underground cable comes here and connects on this side of the air. So this from here and.
Speaker 4 | 09:07
Before we say that, yes, it's correct, we believe it's correct. This is all on an ERA manager's capability, so I would strongly recommend it, house [Laughter].
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 09:21
The I wanted them separately because I didn't... That's one. Then eventually, we'll get them together because we'll have to coordinate together. So what I want to start in separately just.
Speaker 2 | 09:36
We have specific... I want to add to what Dokal said is you have to check all the material equipment, whether they're in better working condition or not. That's not. We don't have any control over the Raphael's point with the check double-check and make sure all that kind of takes it. We are the web structure, our responsibility. Would you come through? Inside the conductor, it will connect.
Same thing on the other side. Just simplify the same approach we have taken at the Costa residence.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 10:04
Okay? Obviously, knowing that the units are down, we know that number one is going to be out for a while.
Speaker 4 | 10:16
The information we have from is June twenty 6 one's.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 10:23
Yeah, that's what they called me.
Speaker 2 | 10:25
But one or two.
Speaker 4 | 10:30
What? Yeah.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 10:31
Like this weekend? Yes, it should be on fairly soon if what they told me is not. I really hope it comes.
Speaker 2 | 10:43
As quickly as possible. So if one goes very hard and I reservation.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 10:47
That's one of my issues. Okay.
Speaker 2 | 10:50
Asking questions.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 10:51
To go, no, you're not asking enough.
Speaker 4 | 10:56
I think we're not looking at connecting to unit to all these units, which is only a safe risk because it's at least a year and given the tracking for the simplicity of the units.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 11:08
Yeah. And I don't know if you've done this exercise yet. But I don't know how much, let's say in a miracle. Okay, number one comes out in a year.
Speaker 2 | 11:24
That's right. I don't know.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 11:28
How much can we export to the 230kV after that or 01:15.
Speaker 2 | 11:32
We'll have to go back and a little bit again because now we've got one and two back end of it to do the planning study. To share generation in addition to what's already working, two is gonna be proposing.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 11:44
Come back on, or at least if one.
Speaker 3 | 11:47
Comes back online, you can redirect from here to whichever substation you want. Yeah. Instead of taking up this transformer, Correct.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 11:58
But why not do that in the first place? That's just.
Speaker 3 | 12:02
It's just a lead time issue with the GSU if we can find one worldwide. But you could do that. It's just a timing issue. The quickest play is to go with the transformer you have. Then, if you can find one source, you have an available connection here, then you could do them concurrently, but the quickest thing is using existing assets.
Speaker 4 | 12:28
Okay, so at this time, to be clear, the study or the preliminary assessment we did is that we believe there is 600 mW of remaining capacity. That's including the two units. Okay. If the two units are on, we want to put more.
It's going to need serious studies because now we're going to end up having more than 50% of the total generation of 3.1 injection one. So, it is even though the system can support it, there might be operational constraints that are going to have to be
[Laughter].
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 13:06
What? Told me when we were doing this. Their plan is that they're going to have that additional generation they're going to pull because number two is coming on but it's coming on with issues. So, their plan is to even if it's to pull out one, come out and pull out number two for extensive repairs.
That's what they told me. Yeah, that is the part of the plan to take it off for cash repairs.
Speaker 4 | 13:44
I would recommend validating that with any of our schools. Yeah, of course.
Speaker 2 | 13:50
I think to simplify the discussion, we said before maybe you want to lay out the plan exactly how you're going to utilize their assets to connect with the step-up units and go through combined cycles and in the power.
We intend to come inside the things that came and think that the connection points are there. Although. But yeah. So all we can do is make a recommendation. But we really don't own the assets and we don't have any reference or any condition.
But what the assets are in right.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 14:27
Not so to my understanding. Was 400 to the unit one. I think That.
Speaker 2 | 14:36
Was. I believe it was a recommended option.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 14:38
Yeah. So, you know, one that it was 200 that was gonna go through. 400 that was gonna go through the unit one, and then the other 200 will go directly to the two thirty.
Speaker 2 | 14:57
They're both going to do thirties.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 14:58
Yeah, but I mean.
Speaker 4 | 15:00
But what we looked at when the studies that we never looked at was 115, although everything we look at is... I think that's particularly so we currently have all of the interconnection points, which is unit one, unit two, and the combined cycles unit. They have each of them, the stack one, the stack two, they have an interconnection point.
Okay, so there are lower interconnection points, 300 that is very bold. If something else gets disconnected.
Speaker 2 | 15:31
You get out of that George goods completely.
Speaker 4 | 15:42
There are four currently connected generators or generator stats. So four generation interconnection points. To use those points, they're going to need to disconnect other generators. If we establish that either one is the fastest or that...
And then there is potentially like media was seeing swapping the year from now to unit two. They need to take a lot of maintenance of it. And then there's the combined cycles unit. They're four and one four diesel generators combining with one sting unit.
So it's two different stats. They're a different level of operational workability right now. So stack one has two or three units working out of the five, and I think number two has three or three units working of the stack.
So there's potential using the tier TV there. Okay. Other than that, the rest of the video transmission lines.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 16:48
Okay.
Speaker 4 | 16:48
So there's no three-bay right now.
Speaker 3 | 16:52
And those bases that are available are here where I've got 200mW marked or here.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 17:00
Okay, the 200mW. But what Raphael was saying that the 200 would have to come from the combined cycle, right? That's there.
Speaker 3 | 17:09
But they connect up the hill to connect to the transmission, correct? So which one of these does it connect to? The big box? Or the... Yeah, but is that this one or this one.
Speaker 2 | 17:20
Because that one.
Speaker 3 | 17:23
So the combined cycle is where we'll take that connection, and it will come up the hill to here.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 17:29
Yes.
Speaker 2 | 17:30
So we're tying in at the combined cycle.
Speaker 3 | 17:33
But. these combined cycle transformers down here are from 13.2 to 230. Is that right? On the site walk, they told us we could connect right at the transformer, which I believe was 13.2 or 13.8. Is that correct?
So instead of going up the hill, we would step up the Rolls Royce to 13.2 to connect here.
Speaker 4 | 17:57
Okay.
Speaker 2 | 17:58
So just for clarification, the combined cycle is 13.2 and unit one, it's 24. So Francisco, what was that 23.23, but it's not 13. No, it's not 15kV. Okay, step we're getting inside that, okay? And what we heard I thought on the site doors, they were 13 or 13.2 that... I forget.
Speaker 4 | 18:24
I think there are two. There's the GSU for unit one and two. I think these are 1.3.48 on the low side.
Speaker 2 | 18:32
You're going into.
Speaker 4 | 18:34
Yes, and the combined cycle, all the transformers for the... yeah.
Speaker 2 | 18:39
So we'll need to... I think to give information, we'll need to step up the transformer to 23 and 13.2. But regardless of the point, I'm coming into two very... [Laughter].
Speaker 3 | 19:05
So having those one lines and getting those details will help us finalize how that works. But that's the general concept.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 19:16
All right.
Speaker 3 | 19:18
And asking about you were talking about the problems you're having with number two and what if number one comes online... You know, as a side conversation you could have you could be building additional capacity. Is another substation here to redirect everything and leave this? The idea is you are allowed to do maintenance on these while running on our system and in the hopes that in the future you have more than enough, right?
And you have backup so you could future-proof by adding a substation up the hill.
Speaker 2 | 19:52
So yeah, I think the concern was that I thought I heard was that the amount of megawatts at a single injection point, not so much inside the plant, but the injection point to the single point injection and into the transmission grid. Is that the concern if unit one comes back? Correct, I think that's correct. More additional on what you're going to have to... I want to come back right. We'll have to do a serious...
So there's... We just have to... I think what we do is we get everything done this summer for the next however long it is, and to evaluate you guys, aircraft will figure out if Unit One's coming back.
If it is, then we would look at a plan to support that at that time. I don't think we necessarily have to figure that out now, but there's... We're bringing in a GSU. We redeployed some of the megawatts in the location, whatever it might be, but we can... We'll call the initial plan, and we can deal with whatever comes up.
So it may be six months from now, you guys look at it and say, "Well, the economics, not you but GRE looks at the economics of bringing unit one back just doesn't make sense." And so this leaves us, yes, or you may say, "We quit." I do want to drink that.
So with the red square, what you're asking here is the possibility of doing a collector BOS where you can basically decide which generator will come by. I don't know if that's exactly what we said, but I'll let George elaborate.
I think it's more just having an independent GSU moving the documents away for you, and if we have to.
Speaker 3 | 21:34
That's right. So, if your connection point is temporarily at Unit 1's GSU, that means you're monopolizing and blocking out Unit 1 if it comes back online. If, in parallel, you're building a connection point up the hill and a connection to Transmission, then you can get Unit 1 back from MI, and you could service Unit 2 without having to do any changes there.
The fastest thing is to connect there. The long-term play is to create a path for our generation that does not get in the way of your current generation, which is influential.
Speaker 2 | 22:12
I called an electoral source. Yes, and if you set it up where we can move generation around so the time points, not the actual physical generation, but again, we don't think we have to decide that today.
I think we got to the plan that was proposed in the RP, which is the entire Unit 1 and at the combx side, it was red circle, it was true. I didn't know it came from the RL line going across that and might that some telecommunication bit my going...
Okay, so that is a blue mark on the top between the top of the 208 hours and the big circle. So, that is a little more to discuss. We can get into more detail on that later without out repro property aspire, yeah.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 23:02
We're just fig we're just figuring out and I think Johnson is we just have to this is a possibility it's a like a long term thing. Obviously, the biggest way, and you know, obviously, we need the units as quickly as possible. The conversation is different now.
It's that we're reaching summer, it's that we're in summer, right?
Speaker 3 | 23:32
That's right.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 23:33
And I know that's going to put a lot of pressure on all of us because I know it's going to be all of us, MA power expectations, and it's going to put a lot of pressure from prepa, and that's going to do the fastest path to power thing.
Speaker 2 | 23:58
But just to clarify, there is no T&KV. Yeah, it's that's the 38A, and our understanding is that it goes to serve that, that's more of a load bus that was meant to serve the terminal, but that's been commissioned. I think it's not switching, that's the load bus we're going to need to talk about now. I guess that you're referring to. Yes, I understand that.
So, one thing I do want to go back on that George mentioned was the demolition of the buildings. We identified this. I mean, there is potential for asbestos, and then to me, that's probably the biggest risk. That timeline, if we identify asbestos and the more remediation necessary,
again, I think we're pretty specific about that in our response.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 24:52
Yeah, that the building.
Speaker 2 | 24:55
Are you referring to whether there's like, George, you're gonna kind of show the area of buildings?
Speaker 3 | 24:59
So there's one down here, a large one, and then there are some smaller ones underneath these Rolls-Royce boxes here. Yeah, all of those buildings need to be taken out so that we can put the turbines and the Rolls-Royce there. This field here is wide open grass.
Speaker 2 | 25:18
So if it's just demolition without issues around asbestos, that's not complicated. The demolition and the intent and the civil work behind that, our civil work, total again, this asbestos is the biggest risk to life.
Then we'd have to reevaluate it. If there's other locations that would work, then we'd just have to work with.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 25:40
Yeah, but if you ask me, I would start then with the Siemens, up top, 800s, right? Which is you have an open... And then obviously you figure out the Siemens 600s. They're going to be on the bottom and they roll.
Speaker 2 | 25:56
Voic can evaluate alternative locations upfront and to minimize the schedule risk. You're right. Good. If there's any other... We'll look at that. Actually, look at that today.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 26:10
Ager has enough space to redirect, and there's space right in front of the 600s, which is empty. Okay, so this space here is completely empty. Yes, so maybe if you... This can be flopped.
Speaker 2 | 26:32
George, how do you see people's fingers?
Speaker 3 | 26:34
Right now? It's very hard. You have to imagine. I'm imagining where they are [Laughter] Under the turban word here is that we correct, yes. So if we roll these Rolls Royce over here, what about these buildings that.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 26:49
That could be a possibility that we have. We would have to talk about the... About those buildings, right? But that land on the site is completely empty.
Speaker 3 | 26:59
So what about up here, up the hill? You could have a space here that's closer to your tie, and anyway, what if we move the Rolls Royce up here?
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 27:07
It's uphill.
Speaker 2 | 27:08
But the problem with that is you're getting further and further away from the time point. The time?
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 27:14
Not really. No, not really, but that is a hill. It looks flat there for a hill, and there's a transmission line going along that there are.
Speaker 2 | 27:26
So you have a very.
Speaker 4 | 27:29
For my awareness, the combined cycle, they're connected. One of them is connected by cables, so it's an underground cable. So it's not easy to see it necessarily at the extremity. The other one used to be a cable, but it failed in January, and I think it will be a temporary overhead to Easi.
Speaker 3 | 27:59
Yeah.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 28:00
They're I think they're around here somewhere right next to the where you have the 30 a k me?
Speaker 3 | 28:10
Yeah.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 28:11
No, they're... There they are, around there. There's a new... They were building a new line there where we went to the site visit.
Speaker 2 | 28:18
In a single cable or something? Fair.
Speaker 3 | 28:22
Okay, so, yeah, we're flexible on the Rolls-Royce moving around, and obviously, the easiest one is to start with the Greenfield here. If no asbestos, all of that is pretty straightforward. Bulldoze it, flatten it out, and start setting.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 28:39
How much are we talking about? How much megawatts are we talking about with the six 800 steens?
Speaker 3 | 28:47
Jason, help me out with that.
Speaker 2 | 28:48
That's kind of a de rated rating, kind of at 300 megs. So it's called 50 megs of turban for the eight hundreds. Okay. And again, that's it's about.
Speaker 5 | 29:02
I was going to say it's about 300 megawatts for those 800 turbines. Then it's about 120 with the six 600 turbines.
Speaker 3 | 29:10
So it's a little over 400 megawatts available to go right to this giant. About.
Speaker 2 | 29:17
We. That's based on a ninety five degree Fahrenheit day. We just use that, right? It's the name plate is, you know, 62 with ISO conditions, but that's useless. Okay.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 29:30
Well, that's a good number. That's just, you know, starting. If we can start with that, 300 is good. Having 300, you know, as quickly as possible, right? Is a good number, right?
Speaker 2 | 29:42
So we will definitely look to maximize megawatts per schedule exactly like you're talking about and look to move around on location if we get into any issues with asbestos remediation. The lowest amount of megawatts are impacted by the civil issues.
Okay. I think you know the connection point. What I've probably suggested maybe the out-of-plan because this way, when we go out to the sidewalk and it's sized being built as well going into the A-picture compensation, but the one going towards the unit one, I think you'll have to build a line right from your generation stack. Yes, and then you got to check everything from the step of unit coming round table all over and in good condition. That would be up to you as well then peace. The break part is that they think will be all type PA type. [Laughter].
Speaker 3 | 30:46
Is the cable direct buried from this transformer up the hill or is it in conduit?
Speaker 2 | 30:52
It's still, to the best of our knowledge, a direct buried steel casing.
Speaker 3 | 30:58
Okay.
Speaker 2 | 30:59
Above 100 Mrandall here from Loom transmission. You should be able to confirm.
Speaker 3 | 31:04
Yeah, but there's not [Laughter] there's no pulling that out and fixing it if it's bad and you got to put a new one in.
Speaker 2 | 31:11
It's complex. It's very... That's what you're talking about going from a step-up unit one step up unit to transition. Yeah, that's owned by the utility, it's not a Blue property. Okay.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 31:28
So no.
Speaker 2 | 31:30
We lost to general, but we have to accommodate. Amold is here and he's familiar with that table of FY. Yeah, right.
Speaker 3 | 31:38
So how quickly can we get those one lines and details on those substations.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 31:46
That would be within TA, right?
Speaker 2 | 31:48
Well.
Speaker 4 | 31:49
Yeah, we can provide single-line diagrams for AP for the 22APV. So yeah.
Speaker 2 | 31:54
We have... But how good is that going to do you? What you really need is the SEN one line.
Speaker 3 | 31:59
Correct, right?
Speaker 2 | 32:01
Yeah.
Speaker 3 | 32:02
I just need to understand the size, capacity, and interconnection of all of this system in this plan.
Speaker 2 | 32:14
Let's get the line 1 lines and the capacities and the SEN one lines.
Speaker 4 | 32:26
Okay let me proceed with that detail. It is digging a list of lines and through you, send it to Marcella, and it will answer yes.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 32:37
Yes and anything you need to rule out, just.
Speaker 2 | 32:42
Just still go through the portal. And yeah, good CL yeah I think able to be Singaporean.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 32:50
Yeah until... And until everything is signed, we still have to go to the portal. I know it's tedious, I understand. And we have the portal guy right there that he's hiding for there. Okay, [Laughter].
Speaker 2 | 33:05
From our perspective, we can give you the 02:31, but anything beyond that.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 33:11
No, I know. And again, we'll have that same conversation with AA and probably I don't know if we want to start with going to the site again because I'm going to have to do that within TA and with Loom.
Speaker 2 | 33:32
So can we do that before the contracts are executed and approved? I wondered if you could have done it today. I was hoping. I mean, I George. George will be in town and Wednesday afternoon. And I'm wondering if we take some time Thursday to do that. George.
Yeah, because I is.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 34:00
As okay, I have to run it by an AA just to make sure that we have authorization to go through that this Thursday, right?
Speaker 2 | 34:11
Thank you. So I don't know I'm not I'll say Friday even one Thursday. I think Thursday probably works a lis better, but.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 34:19
I need.
Speaker 2 | 34:20
Based on Thursday's third confirmation, if there's... yeah.
Speaker 6 | 34:26
And Miguel, this Marcella, quick comment on the portal. Is it okay if they submit in the portal but email and copy me at the same time? Or does it just have to go through you to go into the portal? I'm just trying to think so we could get it as fast as possible.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 34:44
I know. Until everything is signed, it has to go through the portal.
Speaker 6 | 34:48
Okay, just the portal they can.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 34:50
Okay, I just don't want an issue when we have this already set up and somebody complains and we have to hold everything. I thank these guys.
Speaker 2 | 35:01
It's better at these remarks and I think.
Speaker 6 | 35:04
Yeah, no, it's no problem. I just didn't know if there could be some indication to me to go look at the portal, that's all.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 35:11
No. Everything has to go through PowerAdvocate. And then we'll relay it to you the same way we always relay. We always put an open link, and then you can get all the information from there.
Speaker 6 | 35:24
Okay? All right, thanks.
Speaker 3 | 35:26
Do we want to look at the coast sewer?
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 35:29
Yeah, go ahead.
Speaker 2 | 35:30
Before we go, any other questions from the Loom perspective we can help you with at this point or... And I asked you.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 35:37
Any specifics on the tie ins?
Speaker 3 | 35:41
No, I just I think another site visit would be prudent. And getting those one lines, it's critical.
Speaker 4 | 35:48
We'reechnical technical and really.
Speaker 2 | 35:51
Very preliminary.
Speaker 4 | 35:52
This, by the way, we... I think that there are a couple of iterations that are going to need to occur, and there's going to be a discovery of the process as we do at this time. I think it helps a little bit for us to understand what you're trying to do.
Speaker 2 | 36:08
But really not what you can do at this point. Laying out a good solid plan and here's where my... Collectual ports that everyone... Coming into the.
Speaker 4 | 36:17
The comments or questions I may have for you. We did briefly deal with some technical documents in terms of what's required for SCADA points or control points or things like that. There are some interconnection requirements and things like that, so I hope to see that. I don't know. It was in.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 36:42
The packet, it was in the package.
Speaker 4 | 36:44
So do you guys have any questions on that? But I would say it's fairly industry standard, so I don't expect this.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 36:54
Original original package we have.
Speaker 2 | 36:59
George.
Speaker 3 | 37:01
I missed that.
Speaker 2 | 37:01
What? We have the information a little on SCADA and interconnection standards, et cetera, in protection, correct?
Speaker 3 | 37:12
I'd have to check. I'm not sure.
Speaker 2 | 37:14
I'm pretty sure we do. Let's verify that. I do remember my observation was it looked pretty industry standard, so it is pretty safe. So, was it pretty sure we have it? But you guys, Basson and George, you guys could just double-check on that.
The way I think you look at the logical sequences, once you lay out... We'll start a discussion with the protection team to account for more detailed one-on-one discussions and to see how we can next.
So I agree that we're really to be very minute. It's not much to go by, right? But at least we understand where you're coming from. Go right with our whole market.
Speaker 4 | 37:54
The other thing I know we're going to need to discuss at some point. As you go with the whole thing, I saw these things yesterday.
Speaker 2 | 38:04
I think they did a calculated.
Speaker 4 | 38:06
And talking about whether it's 75 units plus, 6 plus, and how many total. We're going to think about whether we're going to manage this volume of units if we can establish a patrol at the point of interconnection, aggregate, and so on. Or maybe you guys have a distraction behind the thein.
Speaker 2 | 38:27
But that would be our expectation. That's what we've done in the past. We do all the aggregation to a single point and then we tie into the utility and take a single signal that we manage.
Speaker 4 | 38:41
And I understand it's going to be a Slack rate or production is a fixed production. Assuming if you guys are going to be managing the process, we're just going to consider all of that. We're just going to consider the kilowatt cents per kilowatt hour in our overall dispatching systems, and I guess we'll be expecting at all times.
Capacity is available, and we'll give you instructions on this platform.
Speaker 2 | 39:10
We agree with that. Our assumption is that you didn't want to have to manage down to the specific tenant level. No, I would like to avoid that. [Laughter].
Speaker 3 | 39:20
That's how we manage some of our larger projects. We tell you the available megawatts, and you tell us when to run them, and we'll manage everything else.
Speaker 2 | 39:32
Yeah, we have sites that have 120 individual units, and it just looks like a single unit for the utilities. The only other thing that mirroring we got to talk about, that is a very small scope. What do we put in the ring?
Right. Are we metering that medium voltage with an assumed transfer loss to high voltage? How do we set this up?
Speaker 3 | 40:02
Yeah, that was the discussion. Speed to market is meter at medium voltage and take some estimated losses if we want to meter at 230kV. I haven't even gotten data on that, but I imagine the lead times are pretty high.
So we know we can meter it at 35kV and go from there.
Speaker 2 | 40:30
We need to talk about it. For a given one, for us, it's going to be in the P8. It's there for us to understand. You will find everything in one single delivery point and in a given. When you sell a gig, you give it to have the 800 megawatt to the cycle.
But the entire C together because in the roadway you have one leader, it's very make, but in the other one you want to use the same data, and the one only needs for that units. Well, two separate questions. One on me,
and one on control, right? So we'll... It'll be a single control unit and then a single control point. Then from a metering perspective, honestly, we probably need to discuss that a little bit more on the long haul.
So.
Speaker 3 | 41:34
Yeah, the controls. We broke the controls down by group, if you will, so we can dispatch groups of generation. Each one has a controller. You'll see it as one total capacity, but we can dial that capacity by running groups that each general generator controller.
Speaker 2 | 41:55
The last piece of, you know. Follow the question. But what do we assume on that?
Speaker 3 | 42:02
Repeat the question.
Speaker 2 | 42:02
Sorry, Ox tower covered any parasitic loads?
Speaker 3 | 42:08
What did we assume?
Speaker 2 | 42:10
Yes.
Speaker 3 | 42:10
We assumed that we would be connected to the grid providing parasitic power. Are you asking how we meter it or no.
Speaker 2 | 42:20
Just the source. Now we're setting that up. Is that more of a generic question or level two, it should be provided by... Yeah, I think that's the assumption we made, and that we would have to work through that, work with the details with an error.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 42:38
Yeah, any for power and.
Speaker 2 | 42:41
Any paracivic ones.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 42:42
Yeah, that'll be looking at... okay.
Speaker 3 | 42:48
Marcella has their hand up.
Speaker 6 | 42:50
Yeah, it's okay. I wanted to talk before we move to Costa Star, and I know you guys are still talking again. But one thing, and this is not on the technical side, but the insurance and bond requirements. I want to be clear before we begin work in any of the Loom premises, we need to make sure that the contract somehow accommodates for the MA requirements. Whether we're adding it to the contract,
it's something I have worked with Miguel to let him know. We just need to make sure you're aware so that it can be incorporated in the process.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 43:27
Yes, correct.
Speaker 6 | 43:31
We haven't yet seen what the prepa is requiring of you, so our risk management team can't say if that's enough or not. So as soon as we are able to see that information, then I can share it to Eric's risk management and let you know if anything else needs to occur.
Speaker 2 | 43:48
Eric, that's going to be a little bit more on your side of the fence, right? Correct.
Speaker 6 | 43:54
Okay, that's... Eric. Okay.
Speaker 2 | 43:56
Eric. So the way this will be set up, Eric, is managing any resources we have in Houston that are supporting... George will be here locally and coordinating as far as the power expectations and asking whoever else we're gonna bring in as subs, and we'll be managing them so that a lot of the administrative support will be handled out of Houston.
Okay.
Speaker 6 | 44:29
One other thing, Raphael. I was going to mention Loom costs. Just put that on the table for discussion. So, depending... Again, we're very early in the process, so we don't know what will be required of Loom at this point. Marcella
does not have a lot of the work in the plan right now to support this. It's not been in our FEMA plans or anything. So we want to just put that out on the table. We need to think about cost recovery. I don't know the details of the contract with the proponent, with you guys, or with Prepa, but we just want to put that on the table.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 45:07
So again, yes, Marcella, you're correct. As far as the same conversation we had before, if Loom has to do any work, Loom will provide us with an estimate of the work to be completed and that will be run through the team. Save our expectations and Prepa will be determined.
Speaker 2 | 45:28
This would be for your point. There's no different connection. So, the connection that is usually brought by the persons' questions, we understand that's given us the path.
Speaker 6 | 45:53
Excuse me, I couldn't hear the last comment.
Speaker 3 | 45:59
Okay. [Laughter] You want to dive into the COA sewer.
Speaker 4 | 46:11
Yeahing my brain? At this point, with the information we have for all the events or the steps we can go, we can go.
Speaker 2 | 46:21
There's not much to go by right now. I didn't have more discussion once you start laying off the plan.
Speaker 3 | 46:29
Okay. So, the next steps are to fly out to Puerto Rico and go on another site visit. You guys are going to get us some one lines for Gary.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 46:42
Yeah.
Speaker 2 | 46:43
The quest for was whatever you need this week.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 46:47
Yeah, if you want Loom to be Thursday going in it up, you want that to be there. I mean, I think.
Speaker 2 | 46:57
Purpose as well. Yeah, I think that the best case is we have both Loom and AA there for the walk here, correct? George?
Speaker 3 | 47:05
Yes, that's you everybody in the same room.
Speaker 2 | 47:07
Yeah. Okay.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 47:10
Alright. So that's... I'll circle back today. I'll tell the plant manager and RP LC over in India that you will be attending on Thursday, including lower personnel. Then what I'll need from you is either Marcella or Rita for Thursday. Just the attendance sheet. Who's going to go to the site visit?
Speaker 2 | 47:41
Okay, we'll give you that.
Speaker 6 | 47:44
Do you think it's going to be Thursday morning or afternoon?
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 47:47
I'd rather it be morning because.
Speaker 6 | 47:49
Yeah, that's what I was hoping you would say. Okay.
Speaker 4 | 47:54
Just for our actions, Marcella. List of attendees for PERS day and confirming putting a placeholder. We're going to start preparing the SL beams for a year to 30. We're not going to send anything that we received from our request or we'll already start to prepare that.
The payments are two actions.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 48:18
Yeah, for now.
Speaker 4 | 48:22
We get.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 48:24
I just don't want... And I am looking at it's going to be this way, and I don't like it, but I don't want everything to fall at one time. At the same time, I want things to go at least a little more escalated, like deal with this and that.
I was looking, it's like it's going to go. We're going to go, and we're all going to have to run. I don't want that to happen, but speaking like that.
Speaker 2 | 49:00
No, I'm not. Like I said, I think we're by to work with you as you have some plan that we just want to do. We're not by any stretch, we're here so we appreciate that. I think the site visit is super important to finalizing the details of the plan.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 49:18
Yes, of course. Yeah, I'll reach out today, but after lunch, I guess after I get the confirmation from Minute. Anything else?
Speaker 3 | 49:36
I'm good.
Speaker 2 | 49:38
Okay, I noticed that we're at the end of our block for the meeting. Are we okay to continue on in the coast to Surno got? I don't know, is there an hour and a half? I'm not sure what we have, but we. I'm just verifying that we can keep going.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 49:52
We still have. [Laughter].
Speaker 2 | 49:55
Okay, we can keep going, got it. I love this. That's what we would like to do.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 50:00
Yeah, keep going, do everything that we can. We can.
Speaker 2 | 50:09
Just cut go. Okay.
Speaker 3 | 50:13
So at Costa Sewer, we've got 85 CAT natural gas gins and 13 Rolls Royce and 44 Iraq Jins. Connecting ultimately to a 115 connection point. 115 KV. On the site visit, they mentioned over here to the left, there was an existing transformer and this. See if I can highlight it here. This small yard here was being decommissioned, which is a 38 38kb.
Speaker 2 | 50:49
That's not accurate.
Speaker 3 | 50:51
It's in service. It is in service, yes. Okay, but correct me if I'm wrong, there were two additional bays in the 01:15 where we could put step-up transformers. Is that correct?
Speaker 2 | 51:05
I believe that they are referring to the interconnection points that were used for Rafile three on four units that are out of service right now. Okay.
Speaker 3 | 51:17
So that's here and here, correct? Right?
Speaker 2 | 51:22
What are the voltages on those? That's 01:15 on the high side, what is on the low the main power transformer is not there.
Speaker 3 | 51:31
The interconnection of this transformer here is not available. Is that correct?
Speaker 2 | 51:38
No, that's your step-down 01:15 to 38.
Speaker 3 | 51:42
Culminate in these two positions here.
Speaker 2 | 51:44
But is that correct that there's a 35kV time point on the low side or not?
Speaker 3 | 51:49
Well, they're just empty bays. As you're understanding, there's no transformation there. There are no Transformers.
Speaker 2 | 51:57
That was across the street, generation, and that was the deputy commission. Okay, so you have to step it up to more for reliability. So there is a connection point on the right inside of that one. You can come inside and you can come...
So. But you have to figure out how you're going to accomplish that form by where you put your stacks and then connect that point to the switch to step up level to come to us on the other section of the W towards the area that is right.
Speaker 3 | 52:40
Now in.
Speaker 2 | 52:42
To the east, right, or right here.
Speaker 3 | 52:45
The right side.
Speaker 2 | 52:46
On the image, right? Yeah, the switch yard will be on the right inside. You can see it. It's so... Yeah.
Speaker 3 | 52:52
So you said there's additional interconnection where my cursors cursors.
Speaker 2 | 52:56
Yeah, there were two 115kV lines that had been decommissioned. So those two positions can potentially be used for the GENERATIONCONNECTION.
Speaker 3 | 53:08
But do they have transformers or just positions available for in positions?
Speaker 2 | 53:13
Okay.
Speaker 3 | 53:14
Then. These two are actually over here.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 53:17
That they were used for the carbide.
Speaker 2 | 53:20
Correct Carbide, yes. So those structures are open to their own bi, and there are preperors. The conductors are some extent I kicked so yeah.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 53:31
I you plan to use is your plan to use any of those structures.
Speaker 3 | 53:37
Our plan is to.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 53:40
Yeah, there's using of structures for overhead cables, but Lu one doesn't own those, they're their property. The information that I've gotten is that there's limited to nonexistent information on that because those were, I think, with those were checked and the video.
Speaker 2 | 54:16
I asked you to sort of make any mos of the structure right there.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 54:20
If you're planning to use you have to.
Speaker 2 | 54:24
But that connection point about online is more feasible. You're aware of this because of the challenge that you're gonna have with the one you were considering before first that.
Speaker 3 | 54:33
Section of that's the old.
Speaker 2 | 54:35
Section of the 01:15 k vs. It's very limited single non-doctor in that area. So it's going to limit the amount of rejection you can make. You have cable terminations, pipes, cable terminations. There's going to be difficult for you to replace that with whatever you are using.
The other thing, and this is pending confirmation with genera. I believe they're planning to reuse those for a battery beaker project.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 55:02
I think so.
Speaker 2 | 55:03
Yeah, and I think the best thing is to we all had st.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 55:08
Yeah, just be this right next to... I'm sorry, I'm on a point and you're gonna have to figure out here. Yeah, exactly. There's a beaker project coming here.
Speaker 3 | 55:23
Where's that here?
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 55:24
No, the batteries are coming into the one door to.
Speaker 2 | 55:28
Yeah.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 55:28
Batteries are coming here. There's a big pick-a project, not even approved yet, but they do have drawings for a pick-a project that might be years away, but it's coming here.
Speaker 2 | 55:40
We're not currently it's in between George it's in between the cats the two cat locations.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 55:48
Yeah, basically, yeah, that building is going to be demolished. Building.
Speaker 3 | 55:56
Yeah.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 56:01
So because they already made the new building here and they're moving everything from this building, so supposedly soon, that's what they said. I think they were just waiting on the furniture to move to the new building.
Once that happens, I think they're going to decommission and demolish that building. But I don't have a very specific history for the question.
Speaker 2 | 56:30
So.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 56:32
That. Tell.
Speaker 3 | 56:34
We may have come across here.
Speaker 4 | 56:37
But not in here is if you want to go with an overhead solution or on the ground.
Speaker 3 | 56:48
We'll go the fastest possible, which I believe will be overhead, but we need to look into that.
Speaker 2 | 56:55
You guys haven't made a site plan. We can there'll be there already, but we'll... Yeah.
Speaker 3 | 57:04
The struggle is we thought this was decommissioned. 38kV and there would be an existing transformer here in the site visit, but that turns out not to be true. So that's okay. We can jump in here at 01:15 and take it away.
That's what this is, a parking lot, right? Is that.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 57:29
What do you mean? That's a parking lot that they're going to take away. Anyways, they were... And not told me that their plan is to move that parking here and here to utilize this parking for the employees.
And they're going to just... There's little to no cars there, or I think less than half the... The st than it used to have. So, their plan is to tear down this parking either way because of the beaker project.
Speaker 2 | 58:03
So maybe numbers put them to... Because the structures are there that goes by, and you might be able to make a better collection. So, yeah, that's a problem, yeah.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 58:17
We have.
Speaker 2 | 58:17
To go to cost of.
Speaker 4 | 58:21
Think cost sort of more tricky than.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 58:27
And so much going on because you have Corco on each side that you don't really have space to expand anywhere. There is obviously easier logistics for GAs and everything, but for the specific times and the space for the generators, it's going to be.
Speaker 2 | 58:50
A bit tricky.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 58:52
It's a little tricky. Yeah, specifically, this is something you need to take into consideration from your top arrow here, your red arrow on that right next to the cats. Yeah, that one down that is slow.
The parking is a little bit slow.
Speaker 2 | 59:14
Yeah.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 59:14
So that takes that into consideration with you because we're putting in the caps or whatever you're putting there for leveling.
Speaker 3 | 59:29
This is batteries.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 59:34
Next to where unit one was going to be. Where do you have your one fitting integration sign?
Speaker 2 | 59:40
We're not using where the batteries are going now. It's a secret project, and it's a little bit difficult to plan around something we don't know about the speaker project.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 59:52
But I have the plans for it. I already have them, but I ask it's not approved yet. It's a concept that it needs to happen when it's going to happen, maybe two, three years, maybe five, maybe six.
Speaker 2 | 01:00:10
We're just working with the information that we have and I think.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:00:15
This is me, this like a.
Speaker 2 | 01:00:17
Couple of weeks. Okay, yeah.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:00:22
Batteries, the batteries there what where the unit one was so you have your 01:50 interconnect e the label where do you have the label? Right there. So the batteries. Did you remember when we passed below the unit where the unit one was?
Yeah, that's where the I.
Speaker 2 | 01:00:51
Okay.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:00:54
So that's on the other side, that doesn't really disrupt anything from this project. And that is that project is approved and it's on its way.
Speaker 3 | 01:01:06
Now since we've got everybody.
Speaker 2 | 01:01:09
No, since we're connecting to the... Interconnection points, which is the first that they were proposing in the oranges where under.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:01:18
So yeah, so for the battery project, they're using the left internection points on the MO.
[Laughter] is there.
Speaker 3 | 01:01:37
Since we've got everybody in the room, is there any available interconnection at the 02:30 for future expansion or is this full across the of.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:01:47
I don't think so. Yeah.
Speaker 2 | 01:01:49
The other two units back on will be difficult in the future.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:01:54
Yeah. Have you got 400? You have almost 800 going through the to the thirty.
Speaker 3 | 01:02:01
Yeah. Same strategy as Gary if you want to expand the future and not mess with that, you could build additional interconnection. But I guess we're kind of running out of real estate here.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:02:15
And cost storage is difficult because I think all the limits to the plant are owned by Corio, like all around the plant, it's owned by Coral.
Speaker 4 | 01:02:30
And came to the same problem we talked about earlier, that the more you have generation and one single point, the more it becomes a single point of failure. You have an event in the substation, and you lose the system like we had on April 16 and December 31.
So, it's always risky to put all the information at one spot. Yeah, and that's what we're trying to balance. Obviously, there's a reason why all the generation publicity. Because we get access to the protected area. This is human injury.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:03:16
My microphone is on. That's the right way to do this. Okay, yeah, definitely.
Speaker 4 | 01:03:30
So that's why we're limited to 200 mW of facility processor. Obviously, if a big unit shuts down permanently or for a long term, that frees up some SPS, I think.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:03:46
I am not sure, but what they told me is that they're bringing down five for.
Speaker 2 | 01:03:52
Like or six months.
Speaker 4 | 01:03:55
I think I just came back. I'll likely use maintenance in early six. We're looking for a couple of months in the fall, I think, for six. Yeah.
Speaker 2 | 01:04:04
What I'm curious.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:04:07
I curious don't know, are you maintenance? What are you.
Speaker 2 | 01:04:10
I'm just curious what type of maintenance those are. Really long maintenance windows.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:04:27
Has to manage the power delivery here. So, he gets nervous, and we put down units, and he doesn't have enough power. So, that's the guy you need to respond respond.
Speaker 2 | 01:04:40
We don't want to put it down.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:04:41
That's the guy who streams at you when you're not generating.
Speaker 2 | 01:04:45
We don't have those big filters, so much smaller units.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:04:49
Yeah, I like that.
Speaker 4 | 01:04:51
Yeah, I mean, two mWs, fairly small, but I think a bunch of a hundred AAs, one set of type of butts around the island. Yeah. Continue building these 300. No.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:05:08
Specifically when too uses 60 or percent of the power in the North, and everything is generated in the South.
Speaker 4 | 01:05:20
I mean, electrically speaking, it's a small island, so the distance doesn't really matter. But in terms of the single point of failure, it is an issue.
Speaker 2 | 01:05:29
So we see that just two... I think there's only the same one. I just maybe look at the right setting down our recommendation maybe look at the structure that we already abandoned and so we need another side. Can we do both of them on Thursday?
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:05:52
Might be able to.
Speaker 2 | 01:05:53
I don't know. How much time are you spending on it?
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:05:55
Yeah, they're an hour away here. It's pretty big, so we need everything to be very specific. You don't want to schedule for Friday.
Speaker 2 | 01:06:10
Yeah, that's Thursday and Friday. Thursday and Friday, yeah, probably. Yeah. Gary GE Thursday.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:06:21
We may have an opportunity to sit down with the plant manager or anything for everybody to update at least clarifying some issues there in each other, each of the plants. So I want to have enough time.
Speaker 2 | 01:06:40
That's good. Let's Thursday, Friday, and Gary, let's assume that's the suggestion. You don't want to do the first to stick. Answer some questions to look at the side music. It's just a suggestion. It's.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:06:58
We can schedule ahead enough so they can be there and then we can do.
Speaker 2 | 01:07:03
Both. That's fine. This that there's a lot in that and a lot of things that they have to do responding to their questions as well.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:07:11
So it's gonna be a lot.
Speaker 2 | 01:07:21
The stocks and the ambitions of the equipment inside the Internet out there and anything else. Just as. Yes, we're used to working with existing sites and the complications associated with that. So, we do a lot of that type of work.
So, we understand completely what you're saying, but that's one of our core confidences. Very rarely is it a Greenfield.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:07:52
That nobody doesn't have it. Right, okay. Anything else for an Ray or Costa sewer?
Speaker 2 | 01:08:02
Just on the... Jason has his hand up.
Speaker 5 | 01:08:07
I just had one quick question, real quick. So, I just wanted to confirm the unit one low voltage. The primary side, the secondary side of the 400mW unit that we're trying to connect to is 2045,
Right?
Speaker 2 | 01:08:21
So it's 245s, 23kb. But it's better we look at the nameplate. Yeah, we have to confirm that.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:08:34
On the side, they said... Yeah.
Speaker 5 | 01:08:38
Okay, because the SUs, the Serbs right now are producing a 13.2, or probably a little bit less, depending on the nameplate rating. But I just wanted to keep that in mind.
Speaker 6 | 01:08:56
Yeah, I'm just trying to get a really rough estimate of the timeline to the point that we're ready to go. I know you may or may not be able to answer this in terms of more evaluation being needed, right? We're going to have the same visits, we're going to have our fives. You guys are going to do more evaluation.
I assume, Miguel, these evaluations need to be done. I shouldn't assume this, but these evaluations need to be done before Prepa signs off on a contract. That's question one, question two is then...
In terms of assuming we have the go-ahead, what amount of time are we really talking about to be ready, right? Ready to say, "Okay, we're going to start doing our deep dives." Now we're going to have all of the information you need to understand the points of interconnection from metering to OT Telecom, confirming of whatever work may need to be done, whether it's working with the structures that cost to serve, obtaining materials, just trying to understand if we have... As you can imagine, we are supporting this 100%, but we're doing other work.
So, trying to say, "When do you think it's really going to hit the fan for us?
Speaker 7 | 01:10:14
I can answer that.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:10:17
We.
Speaker 7 | 01:10:19
We're committed to getting this done in a timeline behind the days, which is something that's crazy.
Speaker 2 | 01:10:26
We've procured all our.
Speaker 7 | 01:10:28
Equipment is ready. We're finishing up on some switch gear. Ray is contracting. We have about 250 men on the ground ready to do all the civil work, all they move all the dirt. We've just got to get this situated right now, but I think by Monday we should have a clear idea, right, Thomas?
Speaker 2 | 01:10:52
Yes, it works.
Speaker 7 | 01:10:54
So we want to hit the ground running as soon as possible. We're ready, equipment's ready, everything is ready. Logistics is ready.
Speaker 2 | 01:11:00
We're ready.
Speaker 4 | 01:11:01
But once the ink is dry and yeah, we're 60 to 90 days.
Speaker 7 | 01:11:05
We've been working on this already for the last four months. Everything, bulldozers, everything, excavators and whatever.
Speaker 2 | 01:11:13
We need, we're ready to go. Step of units and all that.
Speaker 7 | 01:11:17
We've acquired a manufacturer in the back in the States so we'll have our own.
Speaker 2 | 01:11:23
Yeah, we're ready to go. It's a transfer here. If we build it.
Speaker 7 | 01:11:27
Some we have to build, but some are the majority of the stuff is read. And we have some contingency that we just found yesterday. I mean, we can have units up and running connected to diesel until we bring all the energy, but we have a gas company that's coming to do the infrastructure as well.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:11:49
That's okay.
Speaker 6 | 01:11:55
Nope, that's good. And you. We just want to make sure everyone is aware. I appreciate you saying Monday, that said, you're going to go back after Thursday, Friday, do your evaluations and keep this moving really fast, okay?
I can tell you the Loom team has definitely been working on this as a top priority and supporting the process as well. The more we can understand timing for the team, the better they can plan around it. Thank you.
Speaker 2 | 01:12:24
Second question.
Speaker 6 | 01:12:28
I think that was it. I know it was kind of two parts there, but one was the timing when they might know more and when our engineers are going to need to be ready to start working through the deeper dives in discussions.
I assume that we'll have more of that and more knowledge on that on Monday.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:12:47
And know, and I was... We're all here, and I know everybody wants to hit the ground running. I know that the government works that way. We have to... Everybody's anxious to start. Trust me, I am. All of that has worked for the government. Know that.
You know there's hurdles we have to go through. We're pushing through the hurdles as quickly as we can. But I appreciate everybody being available to help and to get this up and running as quickly as possible.
Speaker 4 | 01:13:27
I was going to say, for your awareness, that is very key. This is very likely the way we're connecting for everything, in service. We have various equipment that works because the service is not the case because the equipment is available. None of these equipment has been operated in years. Some may be missing parts,
so we have done a high-level assessment in those equipment. So we believe on our side there's a higher risk connecting us as to store awareness.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:14:03
Yeah. And that's why I want to focus first on the year, just because I don't think it's going to be easier. It's just... And they're two fairly complicated projects. I just think that the interconnection.
Speaker 2 | 01:14:19
Points will be.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:14:21
You just say that, and it's easier to correct. So I want to focus on a GE, I think we can get that running before close.
Speaker 2 | 01:14:37
We'll focus on maximizing the megawatts earlier instead.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:14:42
So. And, yeah, if you give me a rough estimate of this, say in 90 days, I could get a hundred, or I could get the C 800, all of them. I can get 300 or for 90 days. That would be great. I just need a rough estimate. We have a rough estimate specifically the ones so they can see how much availability they're going to have.
Speaker 2 | 01:15:17
That's important.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:15:20
We all know.
Speaker 2 | 01:15:22
There's a lot of detail. We need to hear it. So just understand the.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:15:32
At the end of this again, I'm saying at the end of this, we either love each other or hate each other.
Speaker 2 | 01:15:37
But I'm sure we'll.
Speaker 4 | 01:15:39
I'm just been involved in the hangouts. [Laughter].
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:15:43
Okay? Okay, that's fine. I don't want to be your friend. That's okay, I appreciate that.
Speaker 2 | 01:15:51
Yes.
Speaker 7 | 01:15:52
All right, we're ready.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:15:54
Anything else? Power? Do you have any questions for Lu, any additional questions? So okay, nobody has any questions for discussion, you need more information, I get that, yeah. Anybody from the chat.
Speaker 3 | 01:16:12
We'll see you tomorrow. Questions.
Speaker 2 | 01:16:16
See us tomorrow.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:16:24
Me no, don't rush me, man. [Laughter]. Yes, I'll talk to Marcella today. I'll call you later today, I promise. It's not going to be at 9 PM. I called you yesterday.
Speaker 6 | 01:16:38
So? So I have a 05:30 meeting already, so if you call me before then, that'd be great, because I'm meeting with the team at 05:30.
mgarcia@recomspr.net | 01:16:45
Okay.
Speaker 6 | 01:16:46
All right, thank you.
Speaker 2 | 01:16:48
Everybody meeting together. By the way. Jeff, putting the meeting together?
Speaker 4 | 01:16:54
Yeah. Of.